Consequently, capital budgeting is a mandatory activity for larger fixed asset proposals. The amount of cash involved in a fixed asset investment may be so large that it could lead to the bankruptcy of a firm if the investment fails. However, it may make more sense to upgrade to new equipment when the skills required to maintain the current equipment are so difficult to obtain that the business would be in trouble if its maintenance personnel were to leave the company. This is an especially useful option when the incremental maintenance expenditure is not significant, such as when there is no need for a major equipment overhaul. ![]() This analysis can substantially reduce a company's total investment in fixed assets. Under avoidance analysis, determine whether increased maintenance can be used to prolong the life of existing assets, rather than investing in replacement assets. This analysis is most useful when used as a supplement to the preceding two analysis methods, rather than as the primary basis for deciding whether to make an investment. This is essentially a risk measure, for the focus is on the period of time that the investment is at risk of not being returned to the company. Under the payback approach, determine the period required to generate sufficient cash flow from a project to pay for the initial investment in it. This is perhaps the best capital budgeting analysis tool, since it can consistently result in capital investments that improve company profits. Under this approach, a business is less likely to invest in areas downstream from the bottleneck operation (since they are constrained by the bottleneck operation) and more likely to invest upstream from the bottleneck (since additional capacity there makes it easier to keep the bottleneck fully supplied with inventory). Under constraint analysis, identify the bottleneck machine or work center in a production environment and invest in those fixed assets that maximize the utilization of the bottleneck operation. In short, this supposedly quantitative analysis method is actually subject to qualitative alterations that can significantly impact the decision outcome. Another concern with net present value analysis is that the discount rate used to derive present values can be adjusted downward to ensure that a project is approved this is usually justified on the grounds that a project is low risk. This issue can only be discovered after the fact, by comparing actual to projected cash flows. The result can be projected cash flows that have been adjusted to ensure that a project will be approved. ![]() A concern with using net present value analysis is that the future cash flows associated with a project are uncertain, and are subject to manipulation. ![]() Then compare all proposed projects with positive net present values, and accept those with the highest net present values until funds run out. Under net present value analysis, identify the net change in cash flows associated with a fixed asset purchase, and discount them to their present value. There are a number of methods commonly used to evaluate fixed assets under a formal capital budgeting system. This process is used to create a quantitative view of each proposed fixed asset investment, thereby giving a rational basis for making a judgment. Capital budgeting is the process that a business uses to determine which proposed fixed asset purchases it should accept, and which should be declined.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |